Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush Berry Dream dupes and alternatives Too Faced
4.5 (2,103)·Berry · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Plum rather than berry· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than berry · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Plum rather than berry· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than berry · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than berry· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than berry · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Combination, Dry, Oily, Normal, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: muted pink - mauve / deep plum
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims waterproof
Differences: Red rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than berry· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than berry · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Plum rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Plum rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than berry· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than berry · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
$27Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (16%)4.7 (988)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Pink rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
45
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Plum rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Plum rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than berry· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than berry · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (no swatch colour on one side), so no score is shown.
Colour not compared · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Mauve rather than berry· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than berry · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than berry· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than berry · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than berry· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than berry · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: A burgundy with golden shimmer
Lancôme Blush Subtil Oil-Free Powder Blush in 1000 Berry Bisou, against Too Faced Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush in Berry Dream. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBerry DreamClosest shade match1000 Berry BisouHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour55%80#954b5f#8e3f54Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 5.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall75
Finish50%89SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Overall match 75/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ILIA Soft Focus Blurring Blush - Talc-Free Powder Blush in Magnetic, against Too Faced Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush in Berry Dream. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBerry DreamClosest overall alternativeMagneticHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour55%69#954b5f#a53f55Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall95
Finish50%89SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%70CombinationNormal, Dry, Combination, OilySome differenceBoth marketed for combination skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.