Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush Velvet Crush dupes and alternatives Too Faced
4.5 (2,103)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: powder
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Does not claim comfort· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: nude pink / light to tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in No Filter, against Too Faced Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush in Velvet Crush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVelvet CrushClosest matchNo FilterHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%93#d27067#d9756cVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall91
Finish50%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared84
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 85/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $17 more
