Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush Golden Hour dupes and alternatives Too Faced
4.5 (2,103)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: powder
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (66%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: soft baby pink with neutral undertones
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Same format: powder
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: mini matte peachy pink (no shimmer)
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: happy pink with lilac undertones / medium with neutral universal undertones
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Balm rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Balm rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Patrick Ta Major Headlines Double-Take Crème & Powder Blush Duo in She's That Girl, against Too Faced Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush in Golden Hour. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGolden HourClosest shade matchShe's That GirlHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour55%94#ff8ea1#f8899aVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared71
Finish50%89SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared57
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%73CombinationNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for combination skin
Overall match 76/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
CoverGirl Trublend Skin Enhancer Balm Blush Stick in Pink Sprinkle, against Too Faced Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush in Golden Hour. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGolden HourClosest overall alternativePink SprinkleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%84#ff8ea1#f2859cClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88LightLightSameDepth difference 5.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall64
Finish50%78SatinDewyCloseDewy finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 77/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.