Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush Head In The Clouds dupes and alternatives Too Faced
4.5 (2,103)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Same format: powder
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: mini matte peachy pink (no shimmer)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: peachy pink with golden pearl
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Looks identical · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Combination, Dry, Oily, Normal, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
IT Cosmetics Do It All Serum Color Balm Sun Cream Blush & Bronzer in Sunlit 10, against Too Faced Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush in Head In The Clouds. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHead In The CloudsClosest shade matchSunlit 10How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%95#ff8d87#fd8e8cLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall68
Finish50%89SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%30PowderBalmDifferentBalm rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 81/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Shellie, against Too Faced Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush in Head In The Clouds. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHead In The CloudsClosest overall alternativeShellieHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour55%76#ff8d87#f69483Close colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall91
Finish50%100SatinSatinSameSame satin finish
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared84
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 81/100Shade match 87/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.