Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush Super Candy Clouds dupes and alternatives Too Faced
4.5 (2,103)·Pink · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (66%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: candy pink with cool undertones
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: soft rose glow / golden taupe contour
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stain rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
43
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stain rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: A champagne rose blush fused with Luminous Light to evoke a candlelit glimmer
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: natural rose / light to tan with cool undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Haus Labs Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica in Dragon Fruit Daze, against Too Faced Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush in Super Candy Clouds. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSuper Candy CloudsClosest matchDragon Fruit DazeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%95#f072aa#f46ca6Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall77
Finish50%89SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$7 less (22%)
Ulta Beauty
