Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush Candy Clouds dupes and alternatives Too Faced
4.5 (2,103)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: electric pink glow / medium-tan contour
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
75
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
57
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
77
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: happy pink with lilac undertones / medium with neutral universal undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (66%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than satin (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than satin (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: soft baby pink with neutral undertones
Lawless Pinch My Cheeks Soft-Blur Cream Blush in Gumdrop, against Too Faced Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush in Candy Clouds. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCandy CloudsClosest shade matchGumdropHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%93#fe99c4#f495c0Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall70
Finish50%89SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared87
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%73CombinationNormal, Combination, OilySome differenceBoth marketed for combination skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Dior Rosy Glow Powder Blush in 001 Pink, against Too Faced Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush in Candy Clouds. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCandy CloudsClosest overall alternative001 PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%82#fe99c4#fb8fc8Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall86
Finish50%89SatinNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than satin
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 81/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$19.01 less (59%)
