Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick Crushin dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.4 (4,830)·Pink · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Red rather than pink· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Looks identical · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than pink · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$27Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (4%)4.7 (677)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Berry rather than pink· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Red rather than pink· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (11%)4.6 (2,318)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: glossy· Both claim hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
69
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
$12Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (57%)4.2 (810)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Plum rather than pink· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than pink · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
$12Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (57%)4.2 (810)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Berry rather than pink· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than pink · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
$27Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (4%)4.7 (677)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Red rather than pink· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Red rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Red rather than pink· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Red rather than pink· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick in Love Liberty, against Urban Decay Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick in Crushin. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCrushinClosest shade matchLove LibertyHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall97
Colour60%96#a11930#a61b34Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall48
Finish55%34GlossyMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glossy
Opacity45%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity60%7016-hour wear10-hour wearSome difference10-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Fuchsia Fantasy, against Urban Decay Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick in Crushin. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCrushinClosest overall alternativeFuchsia FantasyHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall89
Colour60%85#a11930#ab2635Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 4.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared65
Finish55%—not comparableGlossyNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Wear & performance15% of overall82
Longevity60%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 82/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.