Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick PDA dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.4 (4,830)·Nude · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (11%)4.8 (1,631)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: glossy
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
69
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)· 6-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
45
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · 6-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Red rather than nude· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)· 6-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
45
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than nude · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · 6-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
$12Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (57%)4.2 (810)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than nude· Shimmer rather than glossy (finish)· 6-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
45
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than nude · Shimmer rather than glossy (finish) · 6-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than nude· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than nude · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than nude· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than nude · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Stainglass Long-wearing Glossy Lip Tint in XOXO, against Urban Decay Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick in PDA. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePDAClosest matchXOXOHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall96
Colour60%94#b9363b#c12f37Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall63
Finish55%89GlossySheer tintCloseSheer tint finish rather than glossy
Opacity45%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Wear & performance15% of overall88
Longevity60%8016-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 88/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.