Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick Give Em Backtalk dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.4 (4,830)·Pink · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Red rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Plum rather than pink· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Plum rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than pink· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: rich brown with cool berry hues
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (11%)4.6 (2,318)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Red rather than pink· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than pink · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Plum rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Plum rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Berry rather than pink· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Berry rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Plum rather than pink· Matte rather than glossy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
34
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Plum rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than pink· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Red rather than pink · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Kosas Wet Stick Moisturizing Shiny Sheer Lipstick with Ceramides in Bikini Blaze, against Urban Decay Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick in Give Em Backtalk. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGive Em BacktalkClosest shade matchBikini BlazeHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%92#511a23#4f1624Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared30
Finish55%—not comparableGlossyNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 73/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in Smoked Purple, against Urban Decay Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick in Give Em Backtalk. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGive Em BacktalkClosest overall alternativeSmoked PurpleHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall85
Colour60%95#511a23#511e27Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 78/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $21 more
Walgreens
