Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick Raw Footage dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.4 (4,830)·Red · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Berry rather than red· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Berry rather than red · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than red· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than red · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (11%)4.8 (1,631)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: glossy· Both claim hydration
Differences: Berry rather than red· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
69
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than red · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (11%)4.6 (2,318)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: mauve red with a matte finish
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Sephora Collection Cream Lip Stain 10HR Liquid Lipstick in 97 Red Desert, against Urban Decay Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick in Raw Footage. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRaw FootageClosest match97 Red DesertHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%93#610f1d#5d1721Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall64
Finish55%34GlossyMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glossy
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall82
Longevity60%7016-hour wear10-hour wearSome difference10-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 87/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $20 more
Ulta Beauty
CVS
