Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick Text Em dupes and alternatives Urban Decay
4.4 (4,830)·Rose · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (11%)4.6 (2,318)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: glossy· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than rose· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
69
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than rose · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Satin rather than glossy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· 6-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
45
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than glossy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Matte rather than glossy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Matte rather than glossy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Charlotte Tilbury Matte Revolution Hydrating Lipstick in Super Model, against Urban Decay Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick in Text Em. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeText EmClosest shade matchSuper ModelHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall98
Colour60%96#9e4f4a#9d514eLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall48
Finish55%34GlossyMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glossy
Opacity45%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity60%7016-hour wear10-hour wearSome difference10-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Gucci Velvet Matte Lipstick in 208 They Met in Argentina, against Urban Decay Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick in Text Em. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeText EmClosest overall alternative208 They Met in ArgentinaHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall96
Colour60%94#9e4f4a#a44c47Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall64
Finish55%34GlossyMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glossy
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall82
Longevity60%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 88/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (61%)
