Kiss Theory Hydrating Glossy Shine Lip Balm Alchemy dupes and alternatives Anastasia Beverly Hills
4.6 (851)·Plum · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Eadem Le Chouchou Softening + Smoothing Peptide Daily Lip Balm in Boba Bounce, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Kiss Theory Hydrating Glossy Shine Lip Balm in Alchemy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAlchemyClosest shade matchBoba BounceHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall84
Colour55%91#7e4047#7b3f41Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 71/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Buxom Full-On Plumping Lip Polish in Brandi, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Kiss Theory Hydrating Glossy Shine Lip Balm in Alchemy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAlchemyClosest overall alternativeBrandiHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall83
Colour55%69#7e4047#903543Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PlumPlumSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared90
Shine40%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shine level
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedTintedNot listed for eitherA transparency not listed for one product
Shimmer25%75SparkleShimmerSome differenceShimmer rather than sparkle
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Longevity100%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall100
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Overall match 82/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.