High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer Champagne + Caviar dupes and alternatives Clinique
3.4 (292)·Golden · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Black rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Black rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Black rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Black rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (62%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Black rather than golden· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Black rather than golden · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (24%)4.5 (1,590)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Black rather than golden· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Black rather than golden · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (46%)4.5 (1,480)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Black rather than golden· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Black rather than golden · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Black rather than golden· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Black rather than golden · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Black rather than golden· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Black rather than golden · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Black rather than golden· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Black rather than golden · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$30 less (81%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Plum rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Plum rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: metallic eggplant with navy flecks
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Green rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
24
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Green rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (62%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Green rather than golden
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Green rather than golden · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than golden· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than golden · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Purple rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
23
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Purple rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Black rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Black rather than golden · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than golden· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than golden · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Black rather than golden· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Black rather than golden · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Black rather than golden· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Black rather than golden · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than golden
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
about-face Matte Fluid Eye Paint in Art of Darkness, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Champagne + Caviar. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChampagne + CaviarClosest shade matchArt of DarknessHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%97#2c2c2c#292929Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 55/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Make Up For Ever Aqua Resist Smoky Eyeshadow Stick in 01 Carbon, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Champagne + Caviar. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChampagne + CaviarClosest overall alternative01 CarbonHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour60%96#2c2c2c#282828Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared0
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 69/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$33 less (89%)
