High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer Flame + Ember dupes and alternatives Clinique
3.4 (292)·Brown · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$31 less (84%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (62%)4.4 (1,922)
Shimmer
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (76%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: deep brown with multi colored shimmer
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims comfort· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sparkling deep brown with red pearl
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm chocolate brown / a rich cool brown
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: mocha brown with gold and silver pearls
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than brown· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than brown · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color in Baby Got M·A·C, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Flame + Ember. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFlame + EmberClosest shade matchBaby Got M·A·CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#704839#6f4637Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall26
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 71/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milani Gilded Eyeshadow Sticks in Terra, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Flame + Ember. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFlame + EmberClosest overall alternativeTerraHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#704839#724b3cLooks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 92/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$31 less (84%)
