High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer Rum + Cola dupes and alternatives Clinique
3.4 (292)·Brown · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (76%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than brown· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than brown · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$31 less (84%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sparkling deep brown with red pearl
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm chocolate brown / a rich cool brown
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Natural rather than metallic (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than metallic (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: deep brown with cool undertones
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Nudestix Magnetic Matte Eye Color in Chocolate, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Rum + Cola. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRum + ColaClosest shade matchChocolateHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#7e543c#82553fVery close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared11
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall80
Longevity50%9512-hour wear11-hour wearClose11-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared0
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0SensitiveOilyDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 64/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique Chubby Stick Eye Shadow Tint For Eyes in Lots o' Latte, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Rum + Cola. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRum + ColaClosest overall alternativeLots o' LatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%80#7e543c#745540Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall60
Longevity50%8012-hour wear8-hour wearClose8-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared70
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%100SensitiveSensitiveSameBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.