High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer Double Latte dupes and alternatives Clinique
3.4 (292)·Brown · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$31 less (84%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm taupe / a shimmering blackened green
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: cool-toned taupe with silver shimmer
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (32%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
26
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Oily rather than sensitive (skin types)
Westman Atelier Eye Pods Cream Eye Shadow in Toujours, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Double Latte. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDouble LatteClosest shade matchToujoursHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#9f7c6c#a47f6dLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall22
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 65/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Strawberry Fudge, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Double Latte. Matched on the deeper eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDouble LatteClosest overall alternativeStrawberry FudgeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#9f7c6c#a17665Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%100SensitiveSensitiveSameBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.