High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer Strawberries + Chocolate dupes and alternatives Clinique
3.4 (292)·Brown · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$31 less (84%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than brown· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (62%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic
Differences: Mauve rather than brown· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (32%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$25.01 less (68%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
about-face Matte Fluid Eye Paint in Capulets, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Strawberries + Chocolate. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeStrawberries + ChocolateClosest shade matchCapuletsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%83#ce9281#d9947bClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumLightCloseDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall22
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 63/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Matte Eyeshadow in Soft Brown, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Strawberries + Chocolate. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeStrawberries + ChocolateClosest overall alternativeSoft BrownHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%77#ce9281#be8b77Close colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87MediumMediumSameDepth difference 5.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.