High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer Rosé + Truffles dupes and alternatives Clinique
3.4 (292)·Rose · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$31 less (84%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (62%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims hydration
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (62%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in So Bright Now, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Rosé + Truffles. Matched on pan 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRosé + TrufflesClosest shade matchSo Bright NowHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#d19787#d39586Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall38
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 72/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Natasha Denona LUXE GLAM COMPACT Quad Eyeshadow Palette in Rosy, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Rosé + Truffles. Matched on the Shell pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRosé + TrufflesClosest overall alternativeRosyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#d19787#cc998dVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall90
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (32%)
