High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer Mixed Greens dupes and alternatives Clinique
3.4 (292)·Green · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (76%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: an olive green with silver shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: an olive green with a walnut shift
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (76%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: emerald green to gold to teal
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$25.01 less (68%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (59%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: duochrome light green with pink reflects
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Dark olive metallic with taupe shimmer/Sage green foil with champagne sparkle
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than green· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than green · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: dark chocolate metallic with golden glimmer/
gold foil with lustrous Gold sparkle
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (59%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than green
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than green · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than green
Score details
Shade match
28
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than green · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (59%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
31
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Ulta Beauty Collection Color Snack Eyeshadow Duo in Sour Candy, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Mixed Greens. Matched on the deeper eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMixed GreensClosest shade matchSour CandyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%82#989171#9c977fClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall83
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Eye Shadow Stick in Filthy Martini, against Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Mixed Greens. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMixed GreensClosest overall alternativeFilthy MartiniHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%71#989171#8a8a72Close colourColour difference 4.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall81
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.