Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
The closest shade to Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder 10 (Rich deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Hourglass Veil Hydrating Skin Tint Foundation in 17, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder in 10. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade10Closest shade match17How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#522810#58290cVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared50
Finish35%12MatteRadiantDifferentRadiant finish rather than matte
Coverage30%100LightLightSameSame light coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, combination, oilyNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 77/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Complexion Crush Foundation in Deep Warm, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder in 10. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade10Closest overall alternativeDeep WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#522810#56240dVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 91/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$20.80 less (53%)
Walgreens
Walmart
