4.0 (1,869)·Deep tan · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: medium to deep skin with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Deep-Tan skin with a neutral-red undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal skin
Retailer shade note: medium to deep skin with neutral undertones
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: medium-to-tan shade with warm undertones
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (26%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than matte finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
90
Looks identical · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than matte finish · Full rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: Tan with Warm Neutral Undertones
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (26%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than matte finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
90
Looks identical · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than matte finish · Full rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
The closest shade to Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder 7 (Deep tan · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Soothing Serum Skin Tint Foundation in 11, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder in 7. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade7Closest shade match11How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#9a5f35#a26135Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared62
Finish35%12MatteRadiantDifferentRadiant finish rather than matte
Coverage30%100LightLightSameSame light coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, combination, oilyNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/oily skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Urban Decay Face Bond Self Setting Waterproof Foundation in 30, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder in 7. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade7Closest overall alternative30How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%92#9a5f35#9e633dVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared93
Finish35%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, combination, oilyNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Overall match 86/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $33 more
