Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Ultra Fair skin with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder Universal Radiant (Very fair · Olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
RMS Beauty ReEvolve Natural Finish Foundation in 00, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder in Universal Radiant. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeUniversal RadiantClosest shade match00How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#f2dfbd#f6dfbdVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 80/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick in 001, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder in Universal Radiant. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeUniversal RadiantClosest overall alternative001How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%83#f2dfbd#f2d8b7Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 81/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $11 more
Sephora
