Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium to tan shade, neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Medium deep shade with warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium tan, neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
The closest shade to Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder 5 (Tan · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Chanel LES BEIGES Water-Fresh Complexion Touch in BO73, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder in 5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5Closest matchBO73How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#b27f52#af8157Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.4
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 88/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $2 more
Sephora
