Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (44%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral beige undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims long-wearing· Claims colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same light coverage· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: light medium, neutral to cool
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
The closest shade to Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder 3.5 (Medium · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
m.ph by Mary Phillips Le Skin Weightless Serum Foundation in Light 70 W, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder in 3.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3.5Closest shade matchLight 70 WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#c1946b#c3956bLooks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.6
Retailer descriptionLight mediumLightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish35%56MatteNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than matte
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, combination, oilyNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick in 009, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder in 3.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3.5Closest overall alternative009How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#c1946b#bf9574Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.2
Retailer descriptionLight mediumLight mediumBoth described as light mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 87/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $31 more
