Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/combination/oily skin
Matches: Same olive undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: very fair with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 24-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: most fair with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: very fair, warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Claims long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: very fair with yellow undertones
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: L0 - Very light with cool undertones
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
The closest shade to Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder Universal (Very fair · Olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
RMS Beauty ReEvolve Natural Finish Foundation in 000, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder in Universal. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeUniversalClosest shade match000How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%80#fef4d9#faead1Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 75/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kryolan Professional Makeup Digital Complexion Fluid Foundation in Y 21, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Yummy Skin Blurring Balm Powder in Universal. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeUniversalClosest overall alternativeY 21How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%76#fef4d9#f9e9d2Close colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Overall match 79/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $12.50 more
Sephora
