Glossy Lip Stain Berry Queen dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (17,842)·Plum · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Red rather than plum· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Red rather than plum · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than plum· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than plum · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Pink rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Berry rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Revlon Super Lustrous Lipstick in Porto Please, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Berry Queen. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBerry QueenClosest shade matchPorto PleaseHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall90
Colour60%92#9f1c44#9d234bVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a finish
Opacity45%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 73/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NYX Professional Makeup Shine Loud High Shine Long-Lasting Liquid Lipstick in Goal Getter, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Berry Queen. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBerry QueenClosest overall alternativeGoal GetterHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall89
Colour60%90#9f1c44#942641Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared65
Finish55%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a finish
Opacity45%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Wear & performance15% of overall82
Longevity60%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 83/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Target
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $22 more
