Glossy Lip Stain Power Mauves dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (17,842)·Mauve · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Glossy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Nude rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Nude rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than mauve· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than mauve · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than mauve· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than mauve · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Red rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Red rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Nude rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Chanel ROUGE COCO Longwear Satin Lipstick Hydrating and Smoothing Lip Care in 115 BIARRITZ, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Power Mauves. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePower MauvesClosest shade match115 BIARRITZHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall86
Colour60%92#bd3b3c#b4433fVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableNot listedSatinNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 70/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Liquid Lip & Cheek Mousse in A Little Tamed, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Power Mauves. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePower MauvesClosest overall alternativeA Little TamedHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall81
Colour60%94#bd3b3c#c3383fVery close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Longevity60%70Long-wearing10-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 10-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 81/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $41 more
Walgreens
