Glossy Lip Stain Polished Peach dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (17,842)·Peach · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same opacity: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than peach· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than peach · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Looks identical · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same opacity: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than peach· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than peach · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims hydration
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same opacity: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Westman Atelier HydroBalm Sheer Tinted Lipstick with Peptides and Hyaluronic Acid in Pop, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Polished Peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePolished PeachClosest shade matchPopHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall94
Colour60%98#ec3f47#eb3c44Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared65
Finish55%—not comparableNot listedSheer tintNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Hazy Matte Lipstick in Mandarin O, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Polished Peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePolished PeachClosest overall alternativeMandarin OHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall80
Colour60%89#ec3f47#e8363cVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightMediumCloseDepth difference 2.7 on the 0–100 scale
Longevity60%70Long-wearing10-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 10-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 84/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $30 more
