Glossy Lip Stain Spicy Sienna dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (17,842)·Red · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than red· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than red · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: deep reddish brown with subtle red pearl
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than red
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than red · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Liquid Lip & Cheek Mousse in Devoted to Chili, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Spicy Sienna. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSpicy SiennaClosest matchDevoted to ChiliHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall94
Colour60%90#791114#6f1816Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableNot listedMatteNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Longevity60%70Long-wearing10-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 10-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 89/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $22 more
