Glossy Lip Stain Pinkies Up dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (17,842)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Dior Rouge Dior On Stage Ink Blur Matte Liquid Lipstick in 122 Captivating Rose, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Pinkies Up. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePinkies UpClosest shade match122 Captivating RoseHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%92#c65d55#c0625cVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared65
Finish55%—not comparableNot listedMatteNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Wear & performance15% of overall100
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 89/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Hazy Matte Lipstick in Mull It Over, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Pinkies Up. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePinkies UpClosest overall alternativeMull It OverHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%92#c65d55#bd6059Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableNot listedMatteNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Longevity60%70Long-wearing10-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 10-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 93/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $20 more
Walmart
