Glossy Lip Stain Power Mauve dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (17,842)·Mauve · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than mauve· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than mauve · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Red rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Red rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics Dazzlelips Crayon Lipstick in Grapeful, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Power Mauve. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePower MauveClosest shade matchGrapefulHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall87
Colour60%94#6f091f#730924Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableNot listedShimmerNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 70/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Violette_Fr LIP NECTAR Hydrating Lip Stain in Amarante Noire, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Power Mauve. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePower MauveClosest overall alternativeAmarante NoireHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall80
Colour60%88#6f091f#690817Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 86/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $8.99 more
