Glossy Lip Stain Fuschia Fantasy dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (17,842)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Red rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Red rather than pink· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same opacity: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a classic, bright, blue-red for a hollywood star pout
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same opacity: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Red rather than pink· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Red rather than pink · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Red rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Plum rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same opacity: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a cool, deep cherry red for cinematic lips
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Liquid Lip & Cheek Mousse in A Little Tamed, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Glossy Lip Stain in Fuschia Fantasy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFuschia FantasyClosest matchA Little TamedHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall85
Colour60%77#c31f2d#c3383fClose colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91LightMediumCloseDepth difference 4.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableNot listedMatteNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Longevity60%70Long-wearing10-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 10-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $41 more
