Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Anise 11.5 dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.2 (5,208)·Very deep · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with neutral brown undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral red undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same natural finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with cool rich-red undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with very warm, rosy undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same natural finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with cool brown undertones
$10.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$28.01 less (72%)4.1 (2,823)
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very rich, deep skin w/ neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: deep with cool red undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: rich skin tones with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin w/ cool undertones
The closest shade to Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Anise 11.5 (Very deep · Cool · rosy undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Make Up For Ever HD Skin Full Cover Multi-Use Waterproof Concealer in 4R76, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Anise 11.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAnise 11.5Closest shade match4R76How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%77#803e2b#77442dClose colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared44
Longevity30%2016-hour wear36-hour wearDifferent36-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 75/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Too Faced Born This Way Super Coverage Multi-Use Concealer in Spiced Rum, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Anise 11.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAnise 11.5Closest overall alternativeSpiced RumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%78#803e2b#733d25Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared86
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 86/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$7 less (18%)
