Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Umber 9 dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.2 (5,208)·Deep tan · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
$10.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$28.01 less (72%)4.1 (2,823)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
44
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very tan to deep skin with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: deep with warm golden undertones
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (56%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Tan-Deep with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral golden undertones
$36Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (8%)4.5 (1,799)
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Deep with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: deep-tan skin tones with red undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin w/ warm golden undertones
The closest shade to Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Umber 9 (Deep tan · Warm · peach undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Kosas Revealer Super Creamy + Brightening Concealer in Tone 8.2 W, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Umber 9. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeUmber 9Closest shade matchTone 8.2 WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#b66434#ae623cVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 78/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer in 49W tan-deep warm, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Umber 9. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeUmber 9Closest overall alternative49W tan-deep warmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%75#b66434#a96946Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$8 less (21%)
