Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Velvet 10.5 dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.2 (5,208)·Deep tan · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same natural finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with subtle red undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Deep with neutral warm undertones
$10.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$28.01 less (72%)4.1 (2,823)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with subtle brown undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral/red undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with very warm, rosy undertones
$36Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (8%)4.5 (515)
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral golden undertones
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (56%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
44
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with cool undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan deep with neutral golden undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral/red undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (56%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral golden undertones
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Olive rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Olive rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
The closest shade to Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Velvet 10.5 (Deep tan · Cool · rosy undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer in 14 Deep, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Velvet 10.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVelvet 10.5Closest shade match14 DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%76#b25f37#a76748Close colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity30%6016-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 77/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Huda Beauty #FauxFilter Matte Buildable Coverage Waterproof Concealer in Honeycomb 7.7 Red, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Velvet 10.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVelvet 10.5Closest overall alternativeHoneycomb 7.7 RedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%76#b25f37#a65b2bClose colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared65
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$1 less (3%)
