Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Apricot 5.5 dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.2 (5,208)·Medium light · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$36Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (8%)4.5 (515)
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral/pink undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$36Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (8%)4.5 (515)
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium with yellow/neutral undertones
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (56%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
44
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium skin with cool undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium to tan skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (59%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (59%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: MD1 - medium to medium-deep with warm undertones, and a golden tone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium tan with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral peach undertones
The closest shade to Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Apricot 5.5 (Medium light · Cool · rosy undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer in 38N medium-tan neutral, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Apricot 5.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeApricot 5.5Closest shade match38N medium-tan neutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%83#e0a079#d3a081Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Too Faced Born This Way Super Coverage Multi-Use Concealer in Warm Beige, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Apricot 5.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeApricot 5.5Closest overall alternativeWarm BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%90#e0a079#dea174Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared86
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 86/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$15 less (38%)
