Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Maple 8.5 dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.2 (5,208)·Medium · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$31 less (79%)4.2 (5,664)
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: MD2 - Medium to medium-deep with warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: MD2.75 - medium-deep with warm undertones, and a deep peach tone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: D0 - medium-deep to deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: tan skin tones with neutral-olive undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: medium-tan skin tones with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium deep with subtle peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
44
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for tan skin with golden undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium deep with golden undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$26.01 less (67%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/dry/combination skin
The closest shade to Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Maple 8.5 (Medium · Warm · peach undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix 36HR Smooth Angles Hydrating Concealer in NC44, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Maple 8.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMaple 8.5Closest shade matchNC44How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#d28a4e#d58a50Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 0.6
Retailer descriptionMedium tanMedium tanBoth described as medium tanThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 85/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milk Makeup Future Fluid Longwear Hydrating Concealer in 17W, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Maple 8.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMaple 8.5Closest overall alternative17WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#d28a4e#ca884eVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80FullBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared86
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, combinationNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (23%)
View at Target
