Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 24 Light dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.3 (618)·Light · Warm · yellow undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: L5 - light to medium with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same buildable coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Light-Medium skin with a golden undertone
$39Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (30%)4.3 (6,833)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light beige with neutral undertone for light to medium skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
$38Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (32%)4.0 (122)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Light-Medium skin with a neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm peach undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
69
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm neutral undertones
$35Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (38%)4.5 (1,573)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$31 less (55%)4.4 (33)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light to medium skin with warm, golden undertones
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$44.01 less (79%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin
The closest shade to Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 24 Light (Light · Warm · yellow undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Chanel N°1 DE CHANEL Revitalizing Foundation in B80, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 24 Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade24 LightClosest shade matchB80How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#e9b588#e7b486Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.7
Retailer descriptionLightNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 84/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
LYS Beauty Triple Fix Blurring and Hydrating Skin Tint Foundation Stick in TG1, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 24 Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade24 LightClosest overall alternativeTG1How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#e9b588#e6b48aLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.8
Retailer descriptionLightLightBoth described as lightThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 93/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$2 less (4%)
