Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 42 Medium dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.3 (618)·Medium tan · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$40 less (71%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very intense dark-medium shade, neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Luminous · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Luminous · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium rich cool skin with a rosy hue
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium-Deep with Red Undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium-Deep with Red Undertones
$35Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (38%)4.5 (1,573)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium tan with neutral undertones
$49Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (13%)4.3 (600)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Dewy rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Dewy · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
$38Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (32%)4.8 (950)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light-medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Light-medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light-medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium-deep skin with neutral/deep peachy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very intense dark-medium shade, neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Medium Deep with warm golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium deep with golden bronze undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$40 less (71%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
The closest shade to Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 42 Medium (Medium tan · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Jung Saem Mool Essential Skin Nuder Long-Lasting Hydrating Compact Cushion Foundation in 30C Cinnamon, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 42 Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade42 MediumClosest shade match30C CinnamonHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#c18d69#c38d66Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared85
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall20
Skin type100%20Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveDryBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rabanne Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation in 50C, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 42 Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade42 MediumClosest overall alternative50CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#c18d69#c7906eVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 93/100Shade match 96/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$32 less (57%)
