Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 70 Deep dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.3 (618)·Deep · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: dark deep with warm undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: D4 - deep with warm undertones, and a red tone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: dark with golden olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: dark with golden neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with warm golden undertones
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$32 less (57%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$32 less (57%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$42.01 less (75%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
$49Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (13%)4.3 (600)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
69
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$32 less (57%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
$49Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (13%)4.3 (600)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (48%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep complexion with neutral peach undertone
$34Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (39%)4.5 (9,894)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability
The closest shade to Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 70 Deep (Deep · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Maybelline Super Stay Lumi-Matte Foundation in 370, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 70 Deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade70 DeepClosest shade match370How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#7f4628#80472aLooks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.6
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 79/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Skin Sheer Glow Tint Hydrating Foundation Stick in 15 Deep, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 70 Deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade70 DeepClosest overall alternative15 DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#7f4628#7f482cLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.7
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 93/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.