Powder Kiss Liquid Lip & Cheek Mousse Burning Love dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (988)·Berry · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Plum rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Plum rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$6.49$12.99Ulta Beauty$20.51 less (76%)4.4 (49,497)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Red rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: mauve red with a matte finish
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Plum rather than berry· Cream rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Cream · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Plum rather than berry · Cream rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$14.01 less (52%)4.4 (280,394)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Lighter· Red rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than berry· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than berry · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than berry· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than berry · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Too Faced Cloud Crush Whipped Lip & Cheek Color in Hopeful Romantic, against MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Liquid Lip & Cheek Mousse in Burning Love. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBurning LoveClosest shade matchHopeful RomanticHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall97
Colour60%95#6f022e#730d32Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared90
Longevity60%9010-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 10-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 85/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Lip Oil Stick in Fortune, against MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Liquid Lip & Cheek Mousse in Burning Love. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBurning LoveClosest overall alternativeFortuneHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall85
Colour60%77#6f022e#6f173cClose colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100BerryBerrySameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Overall match 90/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$20 less (74%)
Walgreens
