Powder Kiss Liquid Lip & Cheek Mousse Devoted to Chili dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (988)·Red · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Plum rather than red· Opaque rather than buildable (opacity)· 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than red · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · 16-hour wear rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Sheer tint rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Sheer tint rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (opacity) · Not listed rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (7%)4.6 (2,318)
Matches: Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than red
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than red · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 10-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Dior Addict Glass Lipstick in 906: Talk My Dior, against MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Liquid Lip & Cheek Mousse in Devoted to Chili. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDevoted to ChiliClosest shade match906: Talk My DiorHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall96
Colour60%93#6f1816#6a1f18Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%4010-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 77/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Retro Matte Liquid Lipstick in Carnivorous, against MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Liquid Lip & Cheek Mousse in Devoted to Chili. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDevoted to ChiliClosest overall alternativeCarnivorousHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%92#6f1816#661b16Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared90
Longevity60%9010-hour wear8-hour wearClose8-hour wear claimed against 10-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 94/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$20 less (74%)
