Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow Babe In Charms dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.5 (1,590)·Peach · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (46%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (7%)4.7 (1,256)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Plum rather than peach· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than peach · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Mauve rather than peach· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: bronzed plum with a hint of violet
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than peach· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than peach · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Copper rather than peach· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than peach · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
42
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Mauve rather than peach· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than peach · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Ogee Sculpted Cream Blush Stick in Topaz, against MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Babe In Charms. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBabe In CharmsClosest shade matchTopazHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#ca7a6f#ce7b69Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall34
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 69/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Glimmer Eyeshadow Multi-Stick in Girl's Girl, against MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Babe In Charms. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBabe In CharmsClosest overall alternativeGirl's GirlHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%87#ca7a6f#be7b72Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 84/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.