Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow Contemplative State dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.5 (1,590)·Nude · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: cream· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than nude· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than nude · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (68%)4.2 (2,863)
Shimmer · Buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than nude· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than nude · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than nude · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: rose gold metallic with warm honey shimmer/
light champagne foil with gold & silver sparkle
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than nude · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than nude · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Say What, against MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Contemplative State. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeContemplative StateClosest shade matchSay WhatHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%94#eeba8b#eebe94Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 60/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Small Molten Metallic Eyeshadow in Kiss Of Klimt, against MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Contemplative State. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeContemplative StateClosest overall alternativeKiss Of KlimtHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%95#eeba8b#e9ba8bLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 81/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$16.01 less (57%)
Sephora
