Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow Painterly dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.5 (1,590)·Nude · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 15-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (11%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: rose champagne with silver and copper sparkle
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
32
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Everything Is Sunshine, against MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Painterly. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePainterlyClosest matchEverything Is SunshineHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#d9a590#d1a28dVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared93
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormalNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 92/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.