Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow Princess Cut dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.5 (1,590)·Pink · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: Rosy-pink with subtle shimmer
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (75%)4.5 (2,019)
Glitter
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: cool-toned baby pink with silver and pink pinpoints
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: Cool-toned pink with silver and pink sparkle
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: cream· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: icy silvery baby pink with rainbow glitter
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne cream, ballerina pink, & deep plum
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (68%)4.2 (2,863)
Shimmer · Buildable
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than duochrome (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Strawberry Fudge, against MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Princess Cut. Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePrincess CutClosest shade matchStrawberry FudgeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#deafb5#dba8adVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared56
Finish65%61DuochromeShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than duochrome
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ColourPop Jelly Much Gel Eyeshadow in Close to You, against MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Princess Cut. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePrincess CutClosest overall alternativeClose to YouHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%76#deafb5#efb7c4Close colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%86LightLightSameDepth difference 5.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 1 of 3 compared94
Finish65%94DuochromeGlitterCloseGlitter finish rather than duochrome
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%—not comparableCreamNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 84/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (29%)
Sephora
