Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow Bare Study dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.5 (1,590)·Nude · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: crushed pearl (shimmer), cool khaki, brown sugar
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (68%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (11%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (68%)4.2 (2,863)
Metallic · Buildable
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (46%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne sparkle with pink flip pearl, copper sparkle with pink flip pearl
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Peach Madeline, against MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Bare Study. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBare StudyClosest shade matchPeach MadelineHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%83#dfb9a4#e7b6a1Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared23
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 63/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Sugarfrost, against MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Bare Study. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBare StudyClosest overall alternativeSugarfrostHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%76#dfb9a4#ddc1abClose colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightMediumCloseDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
34 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$6 less (21%)
