Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow Vintage Selection dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.5 (1,590)·Peach · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (11%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Bronze rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light champagne gold with silver sparkle
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: Earthy Glam (taupe beige glitter), Wood Breeze (olive beige brown shimmer), Night Haze (deep khaki brown matte)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than peach· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than peach · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Powder rather than cream (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than peach· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than peach · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Strapless, against MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Vintage Selection. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVintage SelectionClosest matchStraplessHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%94#b69488#b29188Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$13 less (46%)
