Small Glitter Eyeshadow I Like 2 Watch dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (590)·Terracotta · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: metallic bronze shade packed with multidimensional sparkle & a shimmer finish
Differences: Bronze rather than terracotta· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Bronze rather than terracotta · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than terracotta· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than terracotta · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Bronze rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Bronze rather than terracotta · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than terracotta · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: maple sparkle, sunset sparkle
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than terracotta· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than terracotta · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: deep champagne with silver flecks
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than terracotta · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm chocolate brown / a rich cool brown
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort
$23Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (12%)4.3 (828)
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Matte rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than terracotta· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Bronze rather than terracotta · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
4
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Morphe ChromaPlus 12-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Flickering Sands, against MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in I Like 2 Watch. Matched on pan 7. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeI Like 2 WatchClosest shade matchFlickering SandsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall76
Colour60%64#a66435#b36f4bSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%83MediumMediumSome differenceDepth difference 6.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TerracottaTerracottaSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared19
Finish65%0GlitterMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPaletteCloseBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Longevity50%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 55/100Shade match 76/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Small Molten Metallic Eyeshadow in Object D'Art, against MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in I Like 2 Watch. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeI Like 2 WatchClosest overall alternativeObject D'ArtHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%62#a66435#bd6f3eSlight colour differenceColour difference 6.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%77MediumMediumSome differenceDepth difference 8.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TerracottaTerracottaSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%83GlitterMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared94
Longevity50%9012-hour wear10-hour wearClose10-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Overall match 74/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
34 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$13 less (50%)
Sephora
Walgreens
