Small Glitter Eyeshadow Twinkle dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.8 (590)·White · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (73%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$18Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (31%)3.5 (165)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (77%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: white aurora (light coral glitter) , coral starlight (coral peach matte), Flaming Sunset (neutral peach brown matte)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than white· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than white · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Frozen, against MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in Twinkle. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTwinkleClosest shade matchFrozenHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#dbd6cc#d6d1c9Looks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 81/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Solar Flare Gel Chrome Eyeshadow in Starlight, against MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in Twinkle. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTwinkleClosest overall alternativeStarlightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%84#dbd6cc#e3dac9Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%—not comparablePowderNot listedNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 85/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.